{"id":3876,"date":"2020-11-04T10:27:01","date_gmt":"2020-11-04T10:27:01","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/cipg.or.id\/?post_type=past_project&p=3876"},"modified":"2020-11-04T11:50:35","modified_gmt":"2020-11-04T11:50:35","slug":"an-evaluation-of-rapotivi-a-crowd-ratings-application-to-monitor-television-content-2017","status":"publish","type":"past_project","link":"https:\/\/cpig.arip.web.id\/id\/past_project\/an-evaluation-of-rapotivi-a-crowd-ratings-application-to-monitor-television-content-2017\/","title":{"rendered":"An evaluation of Rapotivi, a crowd-ratings application to monitor television content (2017)"},"content":{"rendered":"

Programme Period: January-December 2017<\/p>\n

Team: Klara Esti, Natasha H. Attamimi<\/p>\n

Hadirnya sistem rating sebagai alat dalam mekanisme pasar tampaknya membuat kondisi ini semakin rumit. Dalam banyak kesempatan, demi memaksimalkan profit, penyeragaman konten berdasarkan sistem rating dilakukan.<\/p>\n

Menanggapi tantangan ini, beberapa pihak sempat menyuarakan pentingnya menghadirkan rating alternatif yang berpihak kepada publik. Dengan menyediakan rating alternatif, diharapkan aneka konten yang tersaji di televisi saat ini diisi oleh tayangan yang lebih mewakili publik dan menampilkan nilai-nilai yang mencirikan keadaban publik. Remotivi, sebagai salah satu lembaga pengawas independen konten TV di Indonesia, memunculkan sebuah inisiatif berupa alat pengaduan yang disebut Rapotivi. Alat pengaduan ini memungkinkan penonton menyuarakan keprihatinan mereka mengenai kualitas konten televisi. Inisiatif ini adalah sebuah pemungkin dari komunikasi dua arah antara warga negara dan pemerintah. Kendati inisiatif ini mengundang banyak pujian, masih terdapat pertanyaan apakan gagasan ini dapat dan\/atau telah diadopsi secara luas baik di level nasional maupun daerah.<\/p>","protected":false},"featured_media":4310,"template":"","categories":[314],"tags":[228,446],"test_type":[40],"class_list":["post-3876","past_project","type-past_project","status-publish","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-past-project","tag-klara-esti","tag-natasha-h-attamimi","test_type-information-social-change"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"\nAn evaluation of Rapotivi, a crowd-ratings application to monitor television content (2017) - Centre for Innovation Policy and Governance (CIPG)<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/cpig.arip.web.id\/id\/past_project\/an-evaluation-of-rapotivi-a-crowd-ratings-application-to-monitor-television-content-2017\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"id_ID\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"An evaluation of Rapotivi, a crowd-ratings application to monitor television content (2017) - Centre for Innovation Policy and Governance (CIPG)\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Programme Period: January-December 2017 Team: Klara Esti, Natasha H. Attamimi Hadirnya sistem rating sebagai alat dalam mekanisme pasar tampaknya membuat kondisi ini semakin rumit. Dalam banyak kesempatan, demi memaksimalkan profit, penyeragaman konten berdasarkan sistem rating dilakukan. Menanggapi tantangan ini, beberapa pihak sempat menyuarakan pentingnya menghadirkan rating alternatif yang berpihak kepada publik. Dengan menyediakan rating alternatif, […]\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/cpig.arip.web.id\/id\/past_project\/an-evaluation-of-rapotivi-a-crowd-ratings-application-to-monitor-television-content-2017\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Centre for Innovation Policy and Governance (CIPG)\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/facebook.com\/ICIPG\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2020-11-04T11:50:35+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/cpig.arip.web.id\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/11\/Crowdrating.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"407\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"577\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@icipg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Estimasi waktu membaca\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"1 menit\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/cpig.arip.web.id\/en\/past_project\/an-evaluation-of-rapotivi-a-crowd-ratings-application-to-monitor-television-content-2017\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/cpig.arip.web.id\/en\/past_project\/an-evaluation-of-rapotivi-a-crowd-ratings-application-to-monitor-television-content-2017\/\",\"name\":\"An evaluation of Rapotivi, a crowd-ratings application to monitor television content (2017) - Centre for Innovation Policy and Governance (CIPG)\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/cipg.or.id\/en\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/cpig.arip.web.id\/en\/past_project\/an-evaluation-of-rapotivi-a-crowd-ratings-application-to-monitor-television-content-2017\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/cpig.arip.web.id\/en\/past_project\/an-evaluation-of-rapotivi-a-crowd-ratings-application-to-monitor-television-content-2017\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/cpig.arip.web.id\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/11\/Crowdrating.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2020-11-04T10:27:01+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2020-11-04T11:50:35+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/cpig.arip.web.id\/en\/past_project\/an-evaluation-of-rapotivi-a-crowd-ratings-application-to-monitor-television-content-2017\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"id\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/cpig.arip.web.id\/en\/past_project\/an-evaluation-of-rapotivi-a-crowd-ratings-application-to-monitor-television-content-2017\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"id\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/cpig.arip.web.id\/en\/past_project\/an-evaluation-of-rapotivi-a-crowd-ratings-application-to-monitor-television-content-2017\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/cpig.arip.web.id\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/11\/Crowdrating.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/cpig.arip.web.id\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/11\/Crowdrating.webp\",\"width\":407,\"height\":577},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/cpig.arip.web.id\/en\/past_project\/an-evaluation-of-rapotivi-a-crowd-ratings-application-to-monitor-television-content-2017\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/cpig.arip.web.id\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"An evaluation of Rapotivi, a crowd-ratings application to monitor television content (2017)\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/cipg.or.id\/en\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/cipg.or.id\/en\/\",\"name\":\"Centre for Innovation Policy and Governance (CIPG)\",\"description\":\"\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/cipg.or.id\/en\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/cipg.or.id\/en\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"id\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/cipg.or.id\/en\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Centre for Innovation Policy and Governance\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/cipg.or.id\/en\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"id\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/cipg.or.id\/en\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/cipg.or.id\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/09\/logo.png\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/cipg.or.id\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/09\/logo.png\",\"width\":10524,\"height\":3501,\"caption\":\"Centre for Innovation Policy and Governance\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/cipg.or.id\/en\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/facebook.com\/ICIPG\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/icipg\",\"https:\/\/instagram.com\/icipg\",\"https:\/\/www.linkedin.com\/company\/cipg-indonesia\/\",\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/c\/CentreforInnovationPolicyandGovernance\/\"]}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"An evaluation of Rapotivi, a crowd-ratings application to monitor television content (2017) - Centre for Innovation Policy and Governance (CIPG)","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/cpig.arip.web.id\/id\/past_project\/an-evaluation-of-rapotivi-a-crowd-ratings-application-to-monitor-television-content-2017\/","og_locale":"id_ID","og_type":"article","og_title":"An evaluation of Rapotivi, a crowd-ratings application to monitor television content (2017) - Centre for Innovation Policy and Governance (CIPG)","og_description":"Programme Period: January-December 2017 Team: Klara Esti, Natasha H. Attamimi Hadirnya sistem rating sebagai alat dalam mekanisme pasar tampaknya membuat kondisi ini semakin rumit. Dalam banyak kesempatan, demi memaksimalkan profit, penyeragaman konten berdasarkan sistem rating dilakukan. Menanggapi tantangan ini, beberapa pihak sempat menyuarakan pentingnya menghadirkan rating alternatif yang berpihak kepada publik. Dengan menyediakan rating alternatif, […]","og_url":"https:\/\/cpig.arip.web.id\/id\/past_project\/an-evaluation-of-rapotivi-a-crowd-ratings-application-to-monitor-television-content-2017\/","og_site_name":"Centre for Innovation Policy and Governance (CIPG)","article_publisher":"https:\/\/facebook.com\/ICIPG","article_modified_time":"2020-11-04T11:50:35+00:00","og_image":[{"width":407,"height":577,"url":"https:\/\/cpig.arip.web.id\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/11\/Crowdrating.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_site":"@icipg","twitter_misc":{"Estimasi waktu membaca":"1 menit"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/cpig.arip.web.id\/en\/past_project\/an-evaluation-of-rapotivi-a-crowd-ratings-application-to-monitor-television-content-2017\/","url":"https:\/\/cpig.arip.web.id\/en\/past_project\/an-evaluation-of-rapotivi-a-crowd-ratings-application-to-monitor-television-content-2017\/","name":"An evaluation of Rapotivi, a crowd-ratings application to monitor television content (2017) - Centre for Innovation Policy and Governance (CIPG)","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/cipg.or.id\/en\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/cpig.arip.web.id\/en\/past_project\/an-evaluation-of-rapotivi-a-crowd-ratings-application-to-monitor-television-content-2017\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/cpig.arip.web.id\/en\/past_project\/an-evaluation-of-rapotivi-a-crowd-ratings-application-to-monitor-television-content-2017\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/cpig.arip.web.id\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/11\/Crowdrating.webp","datePublished":"2020-11-04T10:27:01+00:00","dateModified":"2020-11-04T11:50:35+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/cpig.arip.web.id\/en\/past_project\/an-evaluation-of-rapotivi-a-crowd-ratings-application-to-monitor-television-content-2017\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"id","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/cpig.arip.web.id\/en\/past_project\/an-evaluation-of-rapotivi-a-crowd-ratings-application-to-monitor-television-content-2017\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"id","@id":"https:\/\/cpig.arip.web.id\/en\/past_project\/an-evaluation-of-rapotivi-a-crowd-ratings-application-to-monitor-television-content-2017\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/cpig.arip.web.id\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/11\/Crowdrating.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/cpig.arip.web.id\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/11\/Crowdrating.webp","width":407,"height":577},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/cpig.arip.web.id\/en\/past_project\/an-evaluation-of-rapotivi-a-crowd-ratings-application-to-monitor-television-content-2017\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/cpig.arip.web.id\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"An evaluation of Rapotivi, a crowd-ratings application to monitor television content (2017)"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/cipg.or.id\/en\/#website","url":"https:\/\/cipg.or.id\/en\/","name":"Pusat Kebijakan dan Tata Kelola Inovasi (CIPG)","description":"","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/cipg.or.id\/en\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/cipg.or.id\/en\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"id"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/cipg.or.id\/en\/#organization","name":"Pusat Kebijakan dan Tata Kelola Inovasi","url":"https:\/\/cipg.or.id\/en\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"id","@id":"https:\/\/cipg.or.id\/en\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/cipg.or.id\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/09\/logo.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/cipg.or.id\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/09\/logo.png","width":10524,"height":3501,"caption":"Centre for Innovation Policy and Governance"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/cipg.or.id\/en\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/facebook.com\/ICIPG","https:\/\/x.com\/icipg","https:\/\/instagram.com\/icipg","https:\/\/www.linkedin.com\/company\/cipg-indonesia\/","https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/c\/CentreforInnovationPolicyandGovernance\/"]}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/cpig.arip.web.id\/id\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/past_project\/3876","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/cpig.arip.web.id\/id\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/past_project"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/cpig.arip.web.id\/id\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/past_project"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cpig.arip.web.id\/id\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/4310"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/cpig.arip.web.id\/id\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=3876"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cpig.arip.web.id\/id\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=3876"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cpig.arip.web.id\/id\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=3876"},{"taxonomy":"test_type","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cpig.arip.web.id\/id\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/test_type?post=3876"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}